UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

JAKKS PACIFIC, INC.

2951 28^TH STREET

SANTA MONICA, CA 90405

NOTICE OF SPECIALANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 30,NOVEMBER 18, 2021

We are pleased to invite you to attend a Specialthe 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. to be held on April 30, Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time.

The SpecialAnnual Meeting will be a virtual stockholder meeting through which you can listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. There is no physical location for this Specialthe Annual Meeting. The SpecialAnnual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SMJAKK2021. The purpose of this Specialthe Annual Meeting is to consider and act upon the following matters:

At the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held on June 12, 2020 (the “2020 Annual Meeting”), stockholders voted and approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation which implemented a Reverse Stock Split of our outstanding common stock in the ratio of 1-for-10 (the “July Amendment”). Consistent with the applicable rules concerning the manner in which broker votes are counted for “routine” matters, certain shares of common stock held by brokers and with respect to which the beneficial owner had not provided the broker with voting instructions were voted by the broker in favor of the approval of the July Amendment.

Our Board of Directors subsequently determined that disclosure contained in the definitive proxy statement disseminated to our stockholders in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting suggested that brokers would not have discretionary authority with respect to the approval of the July Amendment, even though, consistent with applicable rules, discretionary voting was permitted.

While our Board of Directors believes it was and is appropriate to include the votes brokers cast pursuant to their discretionary authority and that the July Amendment has been properly approved and is effective, out of an abundance of caution, our Board of Directors has unanimously resolved to submit Proposal 1 for approval of the stockholders which would ratify the filing of the July Amendment. 

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 3,September 28, 2021 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meetingmeeting or any adjournment thereof. The stock transfer books of the Company will remain open. Under Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), stockholders of record as of April 22, 2020 (the record date of the 2020 Annual Meeting at which the July Amendment authorizing the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split was approved), other than holders whose identities or addresses cannot be determined from our records, are being given notice of the Special Meeting, but are not entitled to attend the Special Meeting or vote on any matter presented at the Special Meeting unless they were also holders of Common Stock as of the Record Date.

This notice and the attached proxy statement constitute the notice required to be given toAfter careful consideration, our stockholders under Section 204 of the DGCL in connection with the ratification contemplated by Proposal 1. Under Sections 204 and 205 of the DGCL, when a matter is submitted for ratification at a stockholder meeting, any claim that a defective corporate act ratified under Section 204 is void or voidable due to the failure of authorization, or that the Delaware Court of Chancery should declare in its discretion that a ratification in accordance with Section 204 of the DGCL not be effective or be effective only on certain conditions, must be brought within 120 days from the time a certificate of validation is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State and becomes effective, if applicable, or from the time the stockholders approve, if no certificate of validation is required. If Proposal 1 is approved, the Company expects to file a certificate of validation with regard to the July Amendment promptly after the adjournment of the Special Meeting, and any claim that the filing and effectiveness of the act so ratified is void or voidable due to the failure to receive the requisite stockholder approval at the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Company or that the Delaware Court of Chancery should declare, in its discretion, that the acts so ratified not be effective or be effective only on certain conditions, must be brought within 120 days from the time the certificate of validation is filed with the Secretary of State. Our Board of Directors has approved this ratification pursuant to Section 204each of the DGCL.

OurProposals and has determined that each Proposal is advisable, fair and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals set forth in this proxy statement.statement and “FOR” each of the nominees for director.

For the ten days prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder of record for purposes germane to the SpecialAnnual Meeting. You may make a request by calling our corporate headquarters at (424) 268-9444 during regular business hours. If we determine that a physical in-person inspection is not practicable, such list of stockholders may be made available electronically, upon request. In addition, during the SpecialAnnual Meeting, a live secure link will be provided to any stockholder of record virtually attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting which will provide access to that list of stockholders.

Your vote is important and whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote promptly. You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the internet. If you requested and received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. Voting by proxy will ensure your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. Banks and brokers cannot exercise discretionary voting on certain matters. Accordingly, if you are not a shareholder of record, please follow the instructions provided by the shareholder of record (your bank or broker) so that your shares are voted at the meeting on all matters. You may revoke the proxy at any time before the authority granted therein is exercised.

Details regarding admission to the SpecialAnnual Meeting and the business to be conducted at the SpecialAnnual Meeting are described in the accompanying Notice of SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders and relatedproxy statement. More information about the Company and the Proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting are contained in this proxy statement. The Company urges you to read the proxy statement carefully and in its entirety. 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Stephen G. Berman,

Secretary

Santa Monica, California

March 16,October 8, 2021

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO VIRTUALLY ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE IN ORDER TO ENSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES. IF YOU HAVE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET ACCESS, YOU MAY SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. YOU MAY REVOKE THE PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE AUTHORITY GRANTED THEREIN IS EXERCISED.

JAKKS PACIFIC, INC.

2951 28^TH STREET

SANTA MONICA, CA 90405

PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIALTHE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 30, 2021NOVEMBER 18, 2021

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the Special2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 30,November 18, 2021, and at any adjournment of that meeting (the “Special“Annual Meeting”). Throughout this Proxy Statement, “we,” “us” and “our” are used to refer to the Company.

We have decided to hold a virtual meeting in light of concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and because it improves stockholder access, encourages greater global participation, lowers costs compared to an in-person event, and aligns with our broader sustainability goals. Stockholders attending the virtual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. Information on how to vote online while attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting is discussed below.

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the internet, instead of mailing printed copies of proxy materials to each shareholder. On or about October 8, 2021, we began mailing to our shareholders a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement, the accompanying notice of Annual Meeting and our annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 online. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The SpecialNotice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy via the internet.

You can receive a copy of our proxy materials by following the instructions contained in the Notice regarding how you may request to receive your materials electronically or in printed form on a one-time or ongoing basis. Requests for printed copies of the proxy materials can be made through the internet at http://www.proxyvote.com, by telephone at 1-800-579-1639 or by e-mail at sendmaterial@proxyvote.com by sending a blank e-mail with your control number in the subject line.

For the reasons stated above, the Annual Meeting will be conducted completely online via the internet and there is no physical location for the SpecialAnnual Meeting. Stockholders may attend and participate in the SpecialAnnual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SMJAKK2021. In order to participate in the Special Meeting live via the Internet, you must register www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SM by 8:59 p.m., Pacific/11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29, 2021. If you are a registered holder, you must registermay log in by using the Virtual Control Number included on your Notice of the meeting or proxy card. If you hold your shares beneficially through a bank or broker, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank or broker during registration and you will be assigned a Virtual Control Number in order to vote your shares during the SpecialAnnual Meeting. If you are unable to obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares, you will still be able to attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting (but will not be able to vote your shares) so long as you demonstrate proof of stock ownership. Instructions on how to connect and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SMJAKK2021. Please allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 7:30 a.m., Pacific Time/10:30 a.m. Eastern Time, on April 30,November 18, 2021.

Voting Securities and Votes Required

At the close of business on March 3,September 28, 2021, the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting, (the “Record Date”), there were outstanding and entitled to vote an aggregate of 5,900,4639,538,869 shares of our common stock, par value $.001 per share. All holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. The holders of our Series A Senior Preferred Stock had the right to vote as a separate class on the matter being ratified in Proposal 1, which requisite approval of the holders of the Series A Senior Preferred Stock was sought and obtained by the Company through written consent prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting, and therefore they will not participate in the Special Meeting.

A majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy at the SpecialAnnual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the meeting for all matters to be voted on by the holders of our common stock. All shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy (including shares which abstain or do not vote for any reason with respect to one or more of the matters presented for stockholder approval) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote with respect to any particular matter, but will not be counted as a vote in favor of such matter.

Proposal No. 1 (ratification of the filing and effectiveness of the Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July 6, 2020 (effective July 9, 2020) (the “July Amendment”) which implemented a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock in the ratio of 1-for-10 (the “Reverse Stock Split”)) –(directors) - With respect to the ratificationelection of the July Amendment, under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of the holders ofdirectors, our By-Laws provide that a majority of the sharesvotes cast are required for election of directors in uncontested director elections, but allow our common stock outstandingBoard of Directors (the “Board”) to nonetheless retain a director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast in the event it believes that would serve the best interests of the Company and entitledits shareholders. This is popularly referred to voteas the “Intel” procedure named after Intel Corporation that first adopted such a process in 2006, and which process has been adopted by numerous Fortune 500 companies since then. What this means in practice is that if a director is not elected by a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting, the director shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating Committee of the Board (the “Nominating Committee”) will then consider the matter and make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action is to be taken. The Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the Board’s decision. Inasmuch as this year there is an uncontested slate of director nominations, this process will be implicated.

Effective as of the Record Date for the Specialthis Annual Meeting our Board is required for the approval of Proposal 1. As stated above, holders of our Series A Senior Preferred Stock will not be participating at the Special Meeting.classified into three classes with staggered three-year terms, designated as follows:

Proposal No. 2 (adjournments)(amending stock plan) – With respect to the approval of one or more adjournmentsamending the Company’s stock plan, the affirmative vote of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve Proposal 1 at the time of the Special Meeting, a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy atvotes cast on the Special Meetingmatter is required for approval.

Proposal No. 3 (auditors) – With respect to the approval of Proposal 2.the auditors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter is required for approval.

Proposal No. 4 (executive compensation) - With respect to approval of our executive compensation, while our Board and its Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) will carefully consider the outcome of the vote expressed by our stockholders when making future executive compensation decisions, the vote will not be binding upon them.  The Company will deem the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast to be approval.

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote with respect to any particular matter, but will not be counted as a vote in favor of such matter. Accordingly, an abstention from voting will have no effect on Proposal 2. An abstention from voting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the approval of Proposal 1 (ratificationany of the July Amendment implementing the Reverse Stock Split).Proposals.

If your shares of our common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you, together with a voting instruction card, by such bank, broker or other nominee. Inasmuch as both Proposals are deemed to be “routine” matters, if you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker mayis not permitted to vote your shares FOR both Proposals even if you doon that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not provide your broker with any instructions.given. These matters are referred to as “non-routine” matters. Each of Proposal No. 1 (election of directors), Proposal No. 2 (amending stock plan) and Proposal No. 4 (advisory vote on executive competition) is a “non-routine” matter. A “broker non-vote” will have the same effect as an abstention as described above. 

Virtual Meeting Protocols

How to Vote

If you are a stockholder of the Company and your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the Notice re the proxy materials areand proxy card is being sent directly to you by the Company. If you are a stockholder of record of the Company, you may virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting and vote your shares in person, rather than signing and returning your proxy. If your shares of our common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials are beingNotice will be forwarded to you, by such bank, broker or other nominee. As the beneficial owner, you are also invited to virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting. Since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the SpecialAnnual Meeting unless you obtain a proxy from your broker issued in your name giving you the right to vote the shares at the SpecialAnnual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder with shares registered in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., on the Record Date,record date, you may vote online while virtually attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting or vote by proxy by telephone by internet or by mail. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible to ensure your vote is counted. You may still virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting and vote in person even if you have already voted by proxy.

•To vote online at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. To vote online during the SpecialAnnual Meeting, join the virtual SpecialAnnual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SM.JAKK2021. You will then be prompted to enter the meeting password which you will receive when you register to attend the virtual Special Meetingis your unique control number (included on the Notice (and on the proxy materials)card if requested)) and then follow the instructions in the SpecialAnnual Meeting portal.

•To vote by proxy by telephone. To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from yourthe Notice (and the proxy materials.card if so requested). Your telephone vote must be received by 8:59 p.m., Pacific/11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29,November 17, 2021 to be counted.

•To vote online not at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. To vote through the Internet without attendingthe SpecialAnnual Meeting, go to www.proxyvote.comwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021 to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from yourthe Notice (or the proxy materials.card if so requested). Your Internet vote must be received by 8:59 p.m., Pacific/11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29,November 17, 2021 to be counted.

•To vote by proxy by mail. You may submit your proxy by mail by following the instructions on the Notice to receive a proxy card and then completing and signing the enclosed proxy card and mailing it to the Company in the enclosed envelope. Provided your proxy card is received prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting your shares will be voted as you have instructed.

We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares online via proxy prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting,, and Internet voting to allow you to vote your shares during the SpecialAnnual Meeting,, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.

Generally, if shares are held in street name, the beneficial owner of the shares is entitled to give voting instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares. Since both ProposalsProposal No. 1 (election of directors), Proposal No. 2 (amending stock plan) and Proposal No. 4 (advisory vote on executive compensation) are each considered “routine”“non-routine” matters, your broker will not be able to vote your shares of our common stock without specific instructions from you.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, dealer or other similar organization, you should have received a proxy card andNotice with voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from the Company. Simply complete and mailFollow the proxy cardinstructions from your broker or other agent to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the internet as instructed byor contact your broker or other agent.bank to request a proxy form. To vote in person at the SpecialAnnual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker or other agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.

Any stockholder of record voting by proxy has the right to revoke his, her or its proxy at any time before the polls close at the SpecialAnnual Meeting by sending a written notice stating that he, she or it would like to revoke his, her or its proxy to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, by providing a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date than the proxy being revoked, or by virtually attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance (virtually) alone at the SpecialAnnual Meeting will not revoke a proxy. If a stockholder of the Company has instructed a broker to vote his, her or its shares of our common stock that are held in “street name,” the stockholder must follow directions received from his, her or its broker to change those instructions.

Participation

In orderYou do not need to virtuallypre-register to attend and/or participate in the SpecialAnnual Meeting.  Fifteen (15) minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting all shareholders will havego to pre-register. www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021 and follow the instructions.

If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you can register to virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting on the Internet by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021SMJAKK2021 and following the instructions.  Should you be asked for a password at any point in the process, simply insert your unique control number which is included on the Notice.

If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, to registerand desire to virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting online by webcast you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your Company holdings along with your name and email address by going to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy”www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021 and be receivedfollowing the instructions no later than 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time/2:59 a.m. Eastern Time, on April 29,November 17, 2021.  You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials.

Requests for registration should be directed to us atAlternatively, you can send the following:information by mail to:

By email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com

By mail:

Vote Processing

c/o Broadridge

51 Mercedes Way

Edgewood, NY 11717

Only stockholders of record as of the record date for the Annual Meeting and their proxy holders may submit questions or comments at the Annual Meeting. If you would like to submit a question, you may do so by joining the virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021, entering the meeting password and your unique control number (included on the Notice and proxy card), and typing your question in the box in the Annual Meeting portal.

To help ensure that we have a productive and efficient meeting, and in fairness to all stockholders in attendance, you will also find posted our rules of conduct for the Annual Meeting when you log in prior to its start. In accordance with the rules of conduct, we ask that you limit your remarks to one brief question or comment that is relevant to the Annual Meeting or our business and that remarks are respectful of your fellow stockholders and meeting participants. Questions may be grouped by topic by our management with a representative question read aloud and answered. In addition, questions may be ruled as out of order if they are, among other things, irrelevant to our business, related to pending or threatened litigation, disorderly, repetitious of statements already made, or in furtherance of the speaker’s own personal, political or business interests. Questions will be addressed in the Q&A portion of the Annual Meeting.

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. If you encounter any technical difficulties accessing the virtual Special Meetinglogging onto www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JAKK2021 or during the check-in or meeting, time, you can request assistance by email at virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com or call 1-866-612-8937. Technical supportthere will be a toll-free number and international number available startingon the website to help you. Technicians will be ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have, beginning at 7:0045 a.m. Pacific Time/10:0045 a.m. Eastern Time a.m. on April 30, 2021.November 18, 2021 through the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. You will have the ability to test the system before the Annual Meeting starts.

General Information

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, "FOR" the election of the nominees to the Board and "FOR" each of the other proposals. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his best judgment.

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

A proxy may be revoked by the stockholder at any time before it is exercised by delivery of written revocation or a subsequently dated proxy to our corporate Secretary or by voting online during the SpecialAnnual Meeting.

We are distributingmailing the proxy materialsNotice with respect to this Proxy Statement to our stockholders on or about March 16,October 8, 2021. The proxy materials include our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

For the ten days prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder of record for purposes germane to the SpecialAnnual Meeting. You may make a request by calling our corporate headquarters at (424) 268-9444 during regular business hours or go to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com. In addition, during the SpecialAnnual Meeting, that list of stockholders will be available for examination by any stockholder of record virtually attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting via a live secure link.

Recapitalization

TO RATIFY APPROVALOF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT IN THE RATIO OF 1-FOR-10

(Proposal No. 1)

Background

At the 2020 Annual Meeting, stockholders voted and approved the July Amendment which implemented a Reverse Stock Split in the ratio of 1-for-10. Consistent with the applicable rules concerning the manner in which broker votes are counted for “routine” matters, certain shares of common stock held by brokers and with respect to which the beneficial owner had not provided the broker with voting instructions were voted by the broker in favor of the approval of the July Amendment.

A question has been raised regarding the validity of the vote due to the disclosures contained in the proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting (the “2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement”) regarding the authority of brokers/nominees to vote on the July Amendment without instruction and the fact that the stockholders’ votes in favor of the July Amendment (resulting in the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split) were not tabulated in accordance with such disclosure.

As announced on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2020, stockholders approved the July Amendment, andOn August 7, 2019 , the Company, filed the July Amendment. No shares of common stock have been issued since the filing of the July Amendment, except for shares issued in settlementcertain of the Company’s restricted stock units, upon conversion of previously outstanding notesaffiliates and as per the term of previously existing employment agreements. Nonesubsidiaries, certain holders of the additional authorizedCompany’s 4.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes” and, such holders, the “Investor Parties”), and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. (“Oasis”), in its capacity as holder of 2020 Notes and of the Company’s 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Oasis Notes”), entered into a Transaction Agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”), pursuant to which, on August 9, 2019, the parties thereto consummated certain transactions relating to the restructuring, refinancing and recapitalization of the Company (the “Recapitalization”).

The Recapitalization included, among other things: (i) an investment by the Investor Parties of $30,000,000 in cash and the cancellation of $103,845,000 aggregate principal amount of 2020 Notes held by the Investor Parties for shares of our common stock, available for issuance due toshares of our preferred stock and a new term loan; (ii) the implementationamendment and restatement of the Reverse Stock Split have been issued or are outstanding asexisting $29,550,000 aggregate principal amount of convertible notes held by Oasis, and the cancellation of $7,250,000 aggregate principal amount of 2020 Notes held by Oasis, in each case, for the New Oasis Notes; (iii) the amendment and restatement of the date of this proxy statement, except for approximately 4,782 shares issuedCompany’s existing asset-based revolving credit agreement, including to round up fractional shares followingextend the implementationmaturity thereof; (iv) the repayment in full of the Reverse Stock Split.

On November 10, 2020, a putative shareholder class action was filed inCompany’s existing term loan; (v) the United States District Court of Delaware captioned Brown vs. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. et. al, 1:20-cv-01512 alleging breaches of fiduciary dutiesadoption by our Board, regarding the voting results with respect to the July Amendment (and consequently implementation of the Reverse Stock Split) seeking relief under Section 225 of the DGCL (the “Brown Lawsuit”). The Company and the other defendants, our current directors, intend to contest the Brown Lawsuit vigorously.

Our Board, in consultation with counsel, has determined that the description in the 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement of the lack of authority of brokers/nominees to vote on the July Amendment without instruction may create some uncertainty as to the effect of the vote obtained at the 2020 Annual Meeting. While our Board believes it was and is appropriate to include the votes brokers cast pursuant to their discretionary authority and that the July Amendment has been properly approved and is effective, out of an abundance of caution, our Board has unanimously resolved to submit Proposal 1 (ratification of the July Amendment) for approval of the stockholders to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL to eliminate any uncertainty related to the effectiveness of this corporate act. If Proposal 1(ratification of the July Amendment) is approved by our stockholders and becomes effective, the ratification will be retroactive to July 9, 2020, which was the date of the filing of the July Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

Section 204 of the DGCL allows a Delaware corporation, by following specified procedures, to ratify a corporate act retroactive to the date the corporate act was originally taken.  While the Company does not believe that the July Amendment is invalid and ineffective, our Board determined that it would be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL to eliminate any uncertainty related to its validity or effectiveness. Our Board also recommended that our stockholders approve Proposal 1, and directed that the ratification of the July Amendment be submitted to our stockholders for approval.

The July Amendment does not change the authorized number of shares of Common Stock or preferred stock of the Company, or the par value of the Company’s Common Stock or preferred stock. Except for the shares issuable upon the conversion of our outstanding convertible notes or the exercise of outstanding awards under our equity compensation plans, we do not currently have any plans, proposals or arrangement to issue any of our authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.

The text of the July Amendment is set forth on Appendix A hereto. As explained below, the primary reason for implementing the July Amendment was to meet a listing requirement of Nasdaq. The Board has determined that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposal 1.

Background and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split ; Potential Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split

On June 24, 2019, we received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying us that for the previous 30 consecutive business days the bid price of our Common Stock had closed below $1.00 per share, the minimum closing bid price required by the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the “Minimum Bid Requirement”). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we had 180 calendar days, or until December 23, 2019, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. To regain compliance, the closing bid price of our Common Stock must have been at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this 180-day period. Inasmuch as we did not achieve compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement during such period we received a further notice advising us that we would be delisted. We appealed the delisting determination to a Nasdaq hearing panel and the delisting was stayed pending the panel’s determination. At such hearing, we presented a plan to regain compliance, which plan included implementation of a reverse stock split if necessary, and Nasdaq granted our request for continued listing, subject to the requirement that we shall have demonstrated compliance with Nasdaq listing Rule 5450(a)(1) on or before June 23, 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted Nasdaq to allow an extended timeline to regain compliance, if necessary, which extended such date until September 7, 2020.

The July Amendment allowing us to implement the Reverse Stock Split was part of our plan to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. If we were not able to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement in the applicable time period, our Common Stock would have become subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

In addition to addressing the Minimum Bid Requirement issue, we believe that the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split, by increasing our stock price, makes our Common Stock more attractive to a broader range of institutional and other investors, as we have been advised that the market price of our Common Stock prior to implementation of the Reverse Stock Split may have affected its acceptability to certain institutional investors, professional investors and other members of the investing public. Many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. In addition, some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Moreover, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the then-current average price per share of Common Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. Accordingly, we believe that implementation of the Reverse Stock Split makes our Common Stock a more attractive and cost effective investment for investors.

In addition to increasing the price of our Common Stock, we believe that the Reverse Stock Split provides the Company and its stockholders with other benefits. Currently, the fees that we pay to list our shares on Nasdaq are based on the number of shares we have outstanding. Also, the fees that we pay for custody and clearing services, the fees that we pay to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register securities for issuance and the costs of our proxy solicitations are all based on or related to the number of shares being held, cleared or registered, as applicable. Reducing the number of shares that are outstanding and that will be issued in the future may reduce the amount of fees and taxes that we pay to these organizations and agencies, as well as other organizations and agencies that levy charges based on the number of shares rather than the value of the shares.

Notwithstanding the decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares following the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split, the Board does not intend for this transaction to be the first step in a series of plans or proposals of a “going private transaction” within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act as promulgated by the SEC (the “Exchange Act”).

Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of Outstanding Common Stock

As of the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split, each holder of our Common Stock owned 90% fewer shares of Common Stock and the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock was similarly reduced.

The Reverse Stock Split affected all holders of our Common Stock uniformly and did not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the Company, except that, as described herein under “Fractional Shares,” record holders of Common Stock otherwise entitled to a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split had such fractional share rounded up to the next highest whole number. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split did not affect any stockholder’s proportionate voting power (subject to the treatment of fractional shares). For example, a holder of 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split continued to hold 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split (subject to adjustment for treating fractional shares, but such adjustment is expected to be statistically insignificant).

The number of stockholders of record was not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split.

The Reverse Stock Split may have resulted in some stockholders owning “odd lots” of less than 100 shares of Common Stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots may be higher than the costs of transactions in “round lots” of even multiples of 100 shares.

After the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split our Common Stock received a new Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures (CUSIP) number, which is a number used to identify our equity securities, and stock certificates with the older CUSIP numbers will need to be exchanged for stock certificates with the new CUSIP numbers. Since the Reverse Stock Split, we continue to be subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act.

Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock

The July Amendment and implementation of the Reverse Stock Split did not have any impact on the outstanding shares of Series A Senior Preferred Stock nor on any authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock.

Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of our Convertible Notes

The conversion rate for the Oasis notes was decreased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split.

Authorized Shares of Common Stock

The Reverse Stock Split did not change the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Inasmuch as the number of issued shares of Common Stock decreased as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance increased. Currently, we are authorized to issue up to a total of 105,000,000 shares of capital stock, comprised of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Except for the shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of outstanding awards under our equity compensation plans, issuance of securities as compensation and/or bonus, whether discretionary or as required by existing agreements, and conversion of our outstanding convertible notes, we do not currently have any plans, proposals or arrangement to issue any of our authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.

By increasing the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock available for issuance, the Reverse Stock Split could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect, although this is not the intent of the Board. For example, it may be possible for the Board to delay or impede a takeover or transfer of control of the Company by causing such additional authorized but unissued shares to be issued to holders who might side with the Board in opposing a takeover bid that the Board determines is not in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. The Reverse Stock Split, therefore, may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover attempts. By potentially discouraging initiation of any such unsolicited takeover attempts the Reverse Stock Split may limit the opportunity for our stockholders to dispose of their shares at the higher price generally available in takeover attempts or that may be available under a merger proposal. The Reverse Stock Split may have the effect of permitting our current management, including the current Board, to retain its position, and place it in a better position to resist changes that stockholders may wish to make if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of the Company’s business. However, the Board is not aware of any attempt to take control of the Company, and the Board has not approved the Reverse Stock Split with the intent that it be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.

Fractional Shares

Fractional shares were not issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who would otherwise hold fractional shares of our Common Stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split were rounded up to the next highest whole number resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 4,782 shares.

No Appraisal Rights

No action is proposed herein for which the laws of the State of Delaware or our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or Second Amended and Restated By-Laws provide a right to our stockholders to dissent and obtain appraisal of, or payment for, such stockholders' Common Stock.

Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Equity Compensation Plans and Awards

All of our outstanding equity compensation plan awards have been issued pursuant to the 2002 Plan.

Under the 2002 Plan, in connection with any Reverse Stock Split, the following adjustments will occur automatically, with the Compensation Committee to make all determinations, perform all acts, and exercise all powers and authority necessary or advisable to implement such adjustments: (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that may be acquired under any then outstanding 2002 Plan award will be decreased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split; and (ii) the price (including the exercise price) for each share of Common Stock subject to then outstanding 2002 Plan awards will be increased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split, without changing the aggregate purchase price or value as to which outstanding 2002 Plan awards remain exercisable or subject to restrictions, subject to any rounding as described below.

No fractional interest will be issued under the 2002 Plan on account of the Reverse Stock Split. In connection with the proportionate adjustments described in the preceding paragraph, the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding 2002 Plan awards will be rounded up to the nearest whole share and the exercise prices will be rounded down to the nearest cent, and no cash or other payments will be made in respect of such rounding.

The Compensation Committee’s determination as to the implementation of the adjustments noted above will be final, binding, and conclusive. The Committee will promptly provide each 2002 Plan participant with a notice setting forth, in reasonable detail, the event requiring adjustments (i.e., the Reverse Stock Split), the amount of the adjustments, the method by which the adjustments were calculated, and the change in price and the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each 2002 Plan award after giving effect to the adjustments.

The maximum number of shares of Common Stock available under the 2002 Plan or in connection with 2002 Plan awards was not impacted by implementation of the Reverse Stock Split as they were adjusted proportionately.

Regulatory Effects

The Common Stock is currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, and the Company is subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The Reverse Stock Split did not affect the registration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act or the Company’s obligation to publicly file financial and other information with the SEC and the Common Stock continues to trade on the NASDAQ under the symbol “JAKK”.

Filing of a Certificate of Validation

Upon the receipt of the required vote of the stockholders to approve Proposal 1 (to ratify the July Amendment), we will file a Certificate of Validation with respect to the July Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The time that the filing of this Certificate of Validation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, becomes effective in accordance with the DGCL will be the validation effective time of the ratification proposal within the meaning of Section 204 of the DGCL.

Effect of Ratification Retroactive Validation of the Share Increase Amendment

When the Certificate of Validation becomes effective in accordance withDesignations for our preferred stock, par value $0.001, designated as “Series A Senior Preferred Stock”; (vi) the DGCL,adoption by our Board of (A) the July Amendment will no longer be deemed void or voidable as a result of the potential failure of authorization described above,Second Amended and the effect of the ratification will be retroactive to July 9, 2020, which was the effective time of the original filing of the July Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Proposal

Certain of the Company’s officers and directors have an interest in this proposal as a result of their ownership of shares of stockRestated By-laws of the Company as(the “Second Amended and Restated By-laws”) and (B) the Amended and Restated Charter of the Nominating Committee (the “Nominating Committee Charter”); (vii) the reconstitution of our Board, including the grant of certain board representation rights to the Investor Parties on the terms set forth in the section entitled “Beneficial OwnershipCertificate of Securities” below. However,Designations and the Second Amended and Restated By-laws; and (viii) the entry into Voting Agreements (as defined below) by the Company does not believe that its officers or directors have interests inand the Reverse Stock Split that are different from or greater than thoseother parties thereto.

In connection with the Recapitalization, the Company entered into voting agreements with each of any other stockholder(i) Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited, (ii) certain of the Company.

Accounting Matters

The July Amendment did not (and its ratification will not) affectInvestor Parties, (iii) Oasis, (iv) certain current and former directors and officers of the par valueCompany beneficially owning shares of our Common Stock per share, which will remain $0.001 per share. Ascommon stock and (v) certain additional stockholders (each, a result,“Voting Agreement” and collectively, the “Voting Agreements”). Our common stock beneficially owned by the stockholders subject to the Voting Agreements constitutes, as of the effective timerecord date, approximately 52.5% of our total issued and outstanding common stock.

Pursuant to the terms of the July Amendment implementing the Reverse Stock Split, the stated capital attributableVoting Agreements, each stockholder party to Common Stock and the additional paid-in capital on our balance sheet did, in total, not change. However, the allocation between the stated capital attributablea Voting Agreement has agreed to, Common Stock and the additional paid-in capital on our balance sheet did change because there are now feweramong other things, vote such stockholder’s shares of common stock as follows: (i) to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to classify our Board of Directors into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III, with staggered three-year terms, with Class I comprised of two Common Stock outstanding. The stated capital attributableDirectors (with their terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021), Class II comprised of three Common Stock decreased,Directors, two of whom shall be the New Independent Common Directors (with their terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022), and Class III comprised of two Series A Preferred Directors (with their terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in turn, the stated capital attributable2023), such classification to the additional paid-in capital increased. Further, reported per share net income or loss will be higher because there are fewer shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split

The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of our Common Stock. This discussion is based on the Tax Code, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, and published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in each case in effecteffective as of the date of this Annual Meeting; and (ii) to cause the 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy statement. These authorities may change or be subjectelection to differing interpretations. Any such change or differing interpretation may be applied retroactivelyour Board of any New Independent Common Director nominee selected by the Nominating Committee in a manneraccordance with the Nominating Committee’s Charter. Subject to exceptions that could adversely affect a U.S. Holder and affect the accuracy of this discussion.

We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS or an opinion from legal or tax counsel regarding the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below regarding the tax consequenceswould permit earlier termination of the Reverse Stock Split.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our Common Stock that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is or is treated as:

•an individual who is a citizen or residentVoting Agreements, each of the United States;

•a corporation (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia;

•an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

•a trust if (1) its administration is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and all of its substantial decisions are subject to the control of one or more “United States person” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Tax Code) or (2) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

This discussion is limited to U.S. Holders who hold our Common Stock as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Tax Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to the particular circumstances of a U.S. Holder, including the impact of the alternative minimum tax or the Medicare contribution surtax on net investment income. In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to U.S. Holders that are subject to special rules, including banks and other financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, partnerships, S corporations, and other pass-through entities (and investors in such pass-through entities), insurance companies, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, mutual funds, dealers, brokers, or traders in securities, commodities, or currencies, traders in securities that elect a mark-to-market method of accounting, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax, holders who acquired Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options, through a qualified retirement plan, or otherwise as compensation, holders that actually or constructively own more than 5% of our outstanding stock, holders that hold Common Stock as part of a straddle, hedge, constructive sale, conversion, or integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders that are not U.S. Holders, and U.S. Holders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar.

If a partnership (or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of Common Stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnershipVoting Agreements will generally dependterminate on the status of the partner, the activities of the partner and the partnership, and certain determinations made at the partner level. Accordingly, partnerships (and other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding Common Stock and the partners in such entities should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to them.

In addition, the following discussion does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or state, local and non-U.S. tax law consequences of the Reverse Stock Split. Furthermore, the following discussion does not address any tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after or at the same time as the Reverse Stock Split, whether or not they are in connection with the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split.

ALL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY.

The Reverse Stock Split should constitute a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code. As a result, a U.S. Holder generally should not recognize gain or lossdate upon the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in thewhich no shares of Common Stock held immediately after implementation of the Reverse Stock Split should equal the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of Common Stock held immediately before implementation of the Reverse Stock Split (reduced by the amount of such basis that is allocated to any fractional share of our Common Stock). The U.S. Holder’s holding period in the shares of Common Stock held immediately after implementation of the Reverse Stock Split should include the holding period in the shares of Common Stock held immediately before implementation of the Reverse Stock Split. U.S. Treasury regulations provide detailed rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period among shares of Common Stock which were acquired by a shareholder on different dates and at different prices. U.S. Holders of shares of our Common Stock acquired on different dates and at different prices should consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding period among such shares.

For illustrative purposes only, the following table shows the approximate effect on our Common Stock of a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split, as of May 1, 2020, based upon 35,548,049 shares outstanding on such date:

(i) Subject to adjustment for fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.

(ii) Fully diluted includes shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance (i) upon the settlement of currently outstanding restricted stock units and (ii) upon the conversion of our outstanding Series A Senior Preferred Stock.

Consequences if Proposal 1 is Not Approved by the Stockholders

If Proposal 1 (ratification of the July Amendment) is not approved by the requisite vote of our stockholders, we will not be able to file the Certificate of Validation in order to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL. The failure to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment under Section 204 may leave us exposed to claims that (i) the vote on the July Amendment was not correctly tabulated; (ii) that the Reverse Stock Split therefore was not validly implemented, and (iii) as a result, we may no longer qualify for listing on Nasdaq. Delisting from Nasdaq might significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and would have likely adversely affected our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equity securities. Delisting would have also likely negatively affected the value and liquidity of our Common Stock because alternatives, such as the OTC Bulletin Board and the pink sheets, are generally considered to be less efficient markets. Additionally, failure to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment under Section 204 could cause the Company to be unable to validate our total outstanding shares of Common Stock in connection with any strategic transaction that our Board may determine is advisable, including, without limitation, a sale of the Company, a business combination, merger or reverse merger, or a license or other disposition of corporate assets of the Company.

Time Limitations on Legal Challenges to the Ratification of the July Amendment

If Proposal 1 (ratification of the July Amendment) becomes effective, under the DGCL, any claim that the July Amendment ratified at the Special Meeting is void or voidable due to the failure to receive the requisite stockholder vote for its adoption, or that the Delaware Court of Chancery should declare in its discretion that the ratification proposal (Proposal 1) not be effective or be effective only on certain conditions, must be brought within 120 days from the time that the filing of the Certificate of Validation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware becomes effective in accordance with the DGCL.remain outstanding.

Vote Required

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions and failing to vote will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the adoption of this proposal because the required vote is based on the number of shares outstanding rather than the number of votes cast. Broker non-votes will be considered votes “FOR” the adoption of the proposal.

Our Board Has Approved this Ratification

Section 204 of the DGCL allows a Delaware corporation, by following specified procedures, to ratify a corporate act retroactive to the date the corporate act was originally taken. The Company does not believe that it is clear that the July Amendment is invalid and ineffective. However, on February 15, 2021, our Board determined that it would be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to ratify the filing and effectiveness of the July Amendment pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL to eliminate any uncertainty related to its validity or effectiveness and unanimously adopted the resolutions attached hereto as Appendix B (such resolutions are incorporated herein by reference) approving the ratification. Our Board also recommended that our stockholders approve the ratification for purposes of Section 204, and directed that ratification be submitted to our stockholders for approval.

The text of sections 204 and 205 of the DGCL are attached hereto as Appendix C.

Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the July Amendment.

PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL OF ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING

We are asking you to approve a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve Proposal 1 at the time of the Special Meeting. If our stockholders approve this proposal, we could adjourn the Special Meeting and any reconvened session of the Special Meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from stockholders that have previously returned properly executed proxies voting against approval of Proposal 1. Among other things, approval of this proposal could mean that, even if we had received proxies representing a sufficient number of votes against approval of Proposal 1 such that Proposal 1 would be defeated, we could adjourn the Special Meeting without a vote on the approval of Proposal 1 and seek to convince the holders of those shares to change their votes to votes in favor of approval of Proposal 1. Additionally, we may seek to adjourn the Special Meeting if a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting.

Our Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to be able to adjourn the Special Meeting to a later date or dates if necessary or appropriate for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in respect of the approval of Proposal 1 if there are insufficient votes to approve any such proposals at the time of the Special Meeting or if no quorum is present at the Special Meeting.

Vote Required

Proposal 2 will be approved if the number of votes cast “FOR” the Proposal 2 at the Special Meeting exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” the Proposal 2. Broker non-votes will be considered votes “FOR” the adoption of the proposal.

Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR approval of an adjournment if deemed necessary.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 3,September 30, 2021 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (1) each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) each of our directors, (3) each of our named executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation”, below, and (4) all our directors and executive officers as a group. 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal No. 1)

The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect as directors the two nominees named below, unless you determine to vote against the election of any or all of the nominees by marking the proxy to that effect. All of the nominees currently serve as our directors and have indicated their willingness to continue to serve, if elected, but if any nominee should be unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by management, in accordance with the terms of the Second Amended and Restated By-laws and the Nominating Committee Charter. Each director will be elected to hold office for the terms described below or until his successor is elected and qualified. There are no family relationships between or among any of our executive officers or directors. 

In November 2019, our stockholders approved the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which divided the Board of Directors into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible with one class standing for election each year for a three-year term. The directors in Class I are currently up for election for a three-year term. The directors in Class II are up for election in 2022 for a three year term. The directors in Class III were designated and identified in the Certificate of Designations with their initial terms expiring at the annual meeting of our stockholders to be held in 2023, and thereafter the directors in Class III will be elected to a three–year term solely by the holders of our Series A Senior Preferred Stock and the common stockholders have no right to vote with respect to the election of such Class III directors. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the successors of the class of directors whose term expires shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the third year following the year of their election, with each director in each such class to hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

Pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated By-laws, vacancies on our Board of Directors may only be filled as follows: (i) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a Common Director (Messrs. Berman, Zhao and Shoghi) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director; (ii) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a New Independent Common Director (Ms. Levine and Mr. Cascade) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director, in each case, solely in accordance with the recommendation of the Nominating Committee, with an individual selected by the Nominating Committee from the Preapproved List (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter); and (iii) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a Series A Preferred Director (Mr. Winkler and Ms. MacPherson) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director, in each case, solely with an individual selected by the Required Preferred Holders (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter). Any such director elected in accordance with our Second Amended and Restated By-laws to fill a vacancy on our Board of Directors will serve in accordance with our Second Amended and Restated By-laws until the next election of the class for which such director shall have been chosen and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal.

Nominees

Set forth below for each nominee as director is the nominee’s name, age, and position with us, the Committee of the Board upon which he or she currently sits, his or her principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years and the date of the commencement of his or her term as a director.

Class I Directors – Term expiring at 2021 Annual Meeting

Stephen G. Berman has been our Chief Operating Officer (until August 23, 2011) and Secretary and one of our Directors since co-founding JAKKS in January 1995. From February 17, 2009 through March 31, 2010 he was also our Co-Chief Executive Officer and has been our Chief Executive Officer since April 1, 2010. Since January 1, 1999, he has also served as our President, and since October 23, 2015 he has also served as our Chairman. From the Company’s inception until December 31, 1998, Mr. Berman was also our Executive Vice President. From October 1991 to August 1995, Mr. Berman was a Vice President and Managing Director of THQ International, Inc., a subsidiary of THQ. From 1988 to 1991, he was President and an owner of Balanced Approach, Inc., a distributor of personal fitness products and services. 

Zhao Xiaoqiang has been a Director since April 27, 2017. Since 2002 Mr. Zhao has been the Chairman of Meisheng Holding Co., a private holding company selling cultural products, and since 2007 he has been the Chairman of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp. Ltd., a public company (listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2012) with 23 subsidiaries in the areas of manufacturing, animation, games, movies, online video, stage performance art, e-commerce and overseas investments. Mr. Zhao is also a director of two of the Company’s subsidiaries, JAKKS Meisheng Animation (H.K.) Limited and JAKKS Meisheng Trading (Shanghai) Limited. Mr. Zhao holds an EMBA from Zhejiang University.

Class II Directors – Term expiring at 2022 Annual Meeting

Alexander Shoghi has been a Director since December 18, 2015. Mr. Shoghi is a Portfolio Manager at Oasis Management, a private investment management firm headquartered in Hong Kong. Mr. Shoghi joined Oasis in 2005, first based in Hong Kong, and subsequently relocating to the U.S. as the founder and manager of Oasis Capital in Austin, Texas in early 2012. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Shoghi worked at Lehman Brothers in New York City. Mr. Shoghi holds a Bachelor of Science of Business Administration in Finance and International Business degree from Georgetown University.

Joshua Cascade is a private equity investor with over two decades of private equity experience. From 2014 to 2018 he was a Managing Partner at Wellspring Capital Management, an American private equity firm focused on leveraged buyout investments in middle-market companies, where he previously served as a Partner from 2007 to 2014 and a Principal from 2002 to 2006. As a Managing Partner, he was one of five individuals responsible for firm management. From 1998 to 2002, he was an associate at Odyssey Investment Partners. From 1994 to 1998 he was an Analyst (1994-1996) and an Associate (1996-1998) at The Blackstone Group. Mr. Cascade also teaches a course on leveraged buyouts at Yale School of Management and University of Michigan, Ross School of Business and is a frequent MBA lecturer at numerous institutions. Mr. Cascade graduated with highest distinction from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration.

Carole Levine is currently a Consumer Products Marketing & Sales Consultant, where she works with clients in a range of industries, including toy manufacturing, entertainment, and food and beverage. From 1994 to 2017, she held a number of positions at Mattel, Inc., an American multinational toy manufacturing company, including Vice President, Sales, Mattel & Fisher-Price Emerging Channels (from 2005 to 2012), Vice President, Global Marketing (from 2012 to 2015), Vice President, Interim General Manager, RoseArt (from 2015 to 2017) and Vice President, Retail Business Development - Mattel Consumer Products (from 2015 to 2017). She has also been the Co-Chairman of the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, Los Angeles for over 10 years and a member of the Licensing Industry Marketing Association. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology from the University of Colorado, Boulder and participated in the Accelerated Executive Marketing Program at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Business.

Class III Directors – (not nominees at this Annual Meeting) - Term expiring at 2023 Annual Meeting

Matthew Winkler, age 40, is currently a Managing Director at Benefit Street Partners (“BSP”), a leading credit-focused alternative asset management firm with approximately $34 billion in assets under management. BSP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc. that, together with its various subsidiaries, operates as Franklin Templeton. Mr. Winkler joined Benefit Street Partners in July 2014. Prior thereto, from November 2009 to March 2014, he worked in the Special Assets Group at Goldman Sachs. From July 2003 to November 2009, Mr. Winkler held analyst positions at different firms, focusing on areas such as special situations, distressed debt, and mergers and acquisitions. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Public and Private Sector Organization from Brown University. Mr. Winkler is Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and is also a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees.

Lori MacPherson, age 54, was an entertainment and consumer products executive with over two decades of experience at the Walt Disney Company, a multinational media and entertainment conglomerate. From 2010-2014 she served as Executive Vice President, Global Product Management for The Walt Disney Studios. Prior thereto she was Executive Vice President and General Manager of the global Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment division (2009-2010), Senior Vice President and General Manager of Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment North America (2006-2009) and held a variety of senior Marketing and Product Management positions (1991-2006). Ms. MacPherson currently sits of the Board of Trustees at Polytechnic School in Pasadena, California. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in French Literature from Pomona College.

Qualifications for All Directors

In considering potential candidates for election to the Board, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Class III Directors and the terms of our Second Amended and Restated By-laws and the Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee observes the following guidelines, among other considerations: (i) the Board must include a majority of independent directors; (ii) each candidate shall be selected without regard to age, sex, race, religion or national origin; (iii) each candidate should have the highest level of personal and professional ethics and integrity and have the ability to work well with others; (iv) each candidate should only be involved in activities or interests that do not conflict or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director; (v) each candidate should possess substantial and significant experience that would be of particular importance to the Company in the performance of the duties of a director; and (vi) each candidate should have sufficient time available, and a willingness to devote the necessary time, to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director, including, without limitation, consistent attendance at board and committee meetings and advance review of board and committee materials. The Chief Executive Officer will then interview such candidate. The Nominating Committee then determines whether to recommend to the Board that a candidate be nominated for approval by the Company’s stockholders. The manner in which the Nominating Committee evaluates a potential candidate does not differ based on whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder of the Company. With respect to nominating existing directors, the Nominating Committee reviews relevant information available to it, including the most recent individual director evaluations for such candidates, the number of meetings attended, his or her level of participation, biographical information, professional qualifications and overall contributions to the Company.

In addition, effective as of August 9, 2019, the Nominating Committee Charter provides, among other things, that (i) the Nominating Committee has exclusive authority, on the terms set forth therein, to select nominees to stand for election as the New Independent Common Directors and persons to fill vacancies in the New Independent Common Directors; (ii) that the Nominating Committee will continue to nominate Mr. Cascade and Ms. Levine until no shares of Series A Senior Preferred Stock are outstanding or their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal; and (iii) that any future replacements for the New Independent Common Directors (or their successors) will be selected by the Nominating Committee from a list of preapproved persons as further described in such Charter.

The Board does not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for board membership. However, California law requires that by the end of 2021 California-headquartered public companies with a board of directors the size of the Company have at least three female directors on its board and at least one director on its board who is from an underrepresented community, defined as “an individual who self‑identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self‑identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.” In the event the size of the Company’s board remains the same, the law mandates that by the end of calendar 2022 the number of directors from underrepresented communities on the Company’s board be increased to have at least two directors from underrepresented communities. Nasdaq has also adopted board diversity requirements but the Company believes that by complying with the California diversity requirements it will be in compliance with the Nasdaq requirements. The Company’s board is currently in compliance with all applicable diversity requirements. However, to remain in compliance, the Company will have to appoint another female to its board by the end of calendar 2021.

The Board has identified the following qualifications, attributes, experience and skills that are important to be represented on the Board as a whole: (i) management, leadership and strategic vision; (ii) financial expertise; (iii) marketing and consumer experience; and (iv) capital management.

The Board has determined that five of seven directors who serve on the Board as of the date of this Proxy Statement (Messrs. Cascade, Shoghi and Winkler and Ms. Levine and Ms. MacPherson) are “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq. In making this determination, the Board or the Nominating Committee, as applicable, considered the standards of independence under the applicable rules of Nasdaq and all relevant facts and circumstances (including, without limitation, commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships) to ascertain whether any such person had a relationship that, in its opinion, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our directors serve in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated By-laws until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal. Our officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at its discretion. None of our current independent directors other than Mr. Shoghi has served as such for more than the past five years. Our current independent directors were selected for their financial management expertise (Messrs. Cascade, Shoghi and Winkler) and general business and industry specific experience (Ms. Levine and Ms. MacPherson). We believe that the Board is best served by benefiting from this blend of business and financial expertise and experience. Our remaining directors consist of our Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Berman), who brings management’s perspective to the Board’s deliberations, and Mr. Zhao, who contributes his business experience, including experience in manufacturing and his experience with Chinese markets, to the Board.

In October 2019 and February 2020, Mr. Zhao Xiaoqiang was issued a warning by the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission and a “public condemnation” by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, respectively, primarily due to his failure to fulfill his duties (as a director, controlling shareholder and de facto controller of Meisheng Cultural & Creative Co. Ltd. (“Meisheng Cultural”)) diligently to cause Meisheng Cultural to comply with applicable PRC regulations and stock exchange rules relating to disclosure and internal control, as well as the use of funds of Meisheng Cultural by Meisheng Holdings Group Co., Ltd. (“Meisheng Holdings”), an affiliate of Mr. Zhao and the controlling shareholder of Meisheng Cultural, without proper authorization. In addition, Mr. Zhao and Meisheng Cultural were also requested to strengthen the study of relevant laws and regulations, establish and improve the strict implementation of financial and accounting management systems of Meisheng Cultural, improve Meisheng Cultural’s internal controls, proper governance and quality of information disclosure. Other than the misuse of funds by his affiliate Meisheng Holdings, Mr. Zhao was punished as a result of activities of Meisheng Cultural as he bears certain statutory responsibilities under the applicable PRC regulations and stock exchange rules as its de facto controller and Chairman of the board of directors. Mr. Zhao has advised the Company that the aforementioned matters have nothing to do with his activities as a director of the Company, have all been ratified by Meisheng Cultural, and the related misused funds have been fully repaid by Meisheng Holdings.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of the various risks facing the Company. Risks are considered in virtually every business decision and business strategy. While the Board recognizes that appropriate risk-taking is essential for the Company to remain competitive and achieve its long-term goals, it nonetheless strongly believes that risk taking must be closely monitored.

The Board has implemented the following risk oversight framework: (i) know the major risks inherent in the Company’s business and strategy and compensation policies; (ii) evaluate risk management processes; (iii) encourage open and regular communication about risks between management and the Board; and (iv) cultivate a culture of integrity and risk awareness.

While the Board oversees risk, management is responsible for managing risk. We have developed internal processes to identify and manage risk and communicate appropriately with the Board. Management communicates routinely with the Board, Board Committees and individual Directors on the significant risks identified and how they are being managed and Directors are encouraged to communicate directly with senior management.

The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through its designated and established Committees, which play significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight function. At the initial meeting of the Board of Directors following this annual meeting, the elected directors will review the composition of its various committees. All of our Committees meet regularly and report back to the full Board. The risk oversight functions are allocated among our Committees as follows:

Board Leadership Structure; Executive Sessions

Until the untimely passing of Jack Friedman in May 2010, our board structure featured (i) a combined Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) non-management, active and effective directors of equal importance and with an equal vote. Since Mr. Friedman’s untimely passing in May 2010 we had not selected a Chairman to succeed him until October 1, 2015 when the board determined to elect Mr. Berman to the position of Chairman of the Board. The board intends to continue its current practice of having non-management Board members meet without management present at regularly scheduled executive sessions. Also, at least twice a year, such meetings include only the independent members of the Board. During 2020 at least two of such meetings occurred.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Committees of the Board of Directors

We have an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee. In connection with the Recapitalization, the Capital Allocation Committee, which was established as a standing committee in February 2016, has been dissolved.

Audit Committee. In addition to risk management functions, the primary functions of the Audit Committee are to select or to recommend to the Board the selection of outside auditors; to monitor our relationships with our outside auditors and their interaction with our management in order to ensure their independence and objectivity; to review and assess the scope and quality of our outside auditor’s services, including the audit of our annual financial statements; to review our financial management and accounting procedures; to review our financial statements with our management and outside auditors; and to review the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls. Effective as of their respective dates of appointment to the Board, Messrs. Shoghi (Chair) and Winkler and Ms. Levine are the members of the Audit Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” (as defined in NASD Rule 4200(a)(14)) and able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. Mr. Shoghi, our audit committee financial expert, possesses the financial expertise required under Rule 401(h) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and NASD Rule 4350(d)(2) as a result of his experience as a portfolio manager at Oasis Management. He is further “independent” as defined under Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. We will, in the future, continue to have (i) an Audit Committee of at least three members comprised solely of independent directors, each of whom will be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements (or will become able to do so within a reasonable period of time after his or her appointment); and (ii) at least one member of the Audit Committee who will possess the financial expertise required under NASD Rule 4350(d)(2). The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which reviews and reassesses the adequacy of that charter on an annual basis. The full text of the charter is available on our website at www.jakks.com.

Compensation Committee. In addition to risk oversight functions, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation of management employees and administers plans and programs relating to employee benefits, incentives, compensation and awards under the 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). Messrs. Winkler and Shoghi (Chair) are the members of the Compensation Committee. The Board has determined that each of them is “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s Charter is available on our website at www.jakks.com. Executive officers that are members of the Board make recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of other executive officers who are not on the Board. Except as otherwise prohibited, the Compensation Committee may delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees or individuals. The Compensation Committee has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain or obtain advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of such persons. The Company provides the appropriate funding to such persons as determined by the Compensation Committee, which also conducts an independence assessment of its outside advisors using the six factors contained in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1. The Compensation Committee receives legal advice from our outside general counsel and has retained Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”), a compensation consulting firm, to directly advise the Compensation Committee from time to time.

The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the overall compensation of our executive officers to determine whether discretionary bonuses should be granted. In 2015, Lipis Consulting, Inc. (“LCI”), a compensation consulting firm, presented a report to the Compensation Committee comparing our performance, size and executive compensation levels to those of peer group companies. LCI also reviewed with the Compensation Committee the base salaries, annual bonuses, total cash compensation, long-term compensation and total compensation of our senior executive officers relative to those companies. The performance comparison presented to the Compensation Committee each year includes a comparison of our total shareholder return, earnings per share growth, sales, net income (and one-year growth of both measures) to the peer group companies. The Compensation Committee reviews this information along with details about the components of each executive officer’s compensation.

A compensation consultant was not consulted during 2020.

Nominating Committee. In addition to risk oversight functions, the Nominating Committee develops our corporate governance system and reviews proposed new members of the Board, including those recommended by our stockholders. Messrs. Winkler (Chair) and Cascade and Ms. MacPherson are the members of the Nominating Committee, which operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the full text of which is available on our website at www.jakks.com. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq.

The Nominating Committee will annually review the composition of the Board and the ability of its current members to continue effectively as directors for the upcoming fiscal year. The Nominating Committee established the position of Chairman of the Board in 2015. In the ordinary course, absent special circumstances or a change in the criteria for Board membership, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, the Nominating Committee will re-nominate incumbent directors who continue to be qualified for Board service and are willing to continue as directors. If the Nominating Committee thinks it is in the Company’s best interests to nominate a new individual for director in connection with an annual meeting of stockholders, or if a vacancy on the Board occurs between annual stockholder meetings or an incumbent director chooses not to run, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, and the terms of the Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and the Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee will seek out potential candidates for Board appointment who meet the criteria for selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought. Except as described below with respect to the New Independent Common Directors, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, and the terms of the Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and the Nominating Committee Charter, director candidates will be selected based on input from members of the Board, our senior management and, if the Nominating Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The Nominating Committee will evaluate each candidate’s qualifications and check relevant references, and each candidate will be interviewed by at least one member of the Nominating Committee. Candidates meriting serious consideration will meet with all members of the Board. Based on this input, the Nominating Committee will evaluate whether a prospective candidate is qualified to serve as a director and whether the Nominating Committee should recommend to the Board that this candidate be appointed to fill a current vacancy on the Board, or be presented for the approval of the stockholders, as appropriate.

In addition, effective as of the closing date of the Recapitalization, the Amended and Restated Nominating Committee Charter provides, among other things, that (i) the Nominating Committee has exclusive authority, on the terms set forth therein, to select nominees to stand for election as the New Independent Common Directors and persons to fill vacancies in the New Independent Common Directors; (ii) that the Nominating Committee will continue to nominate Mr. Cascade and Ms. Levine until no shares of Series A Senior Preferred Stock are outstanding or their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal; and (iii) that any future replacements for the New Independent Common Directors (or their successors) will be selected by the Nominating Committee from the Preapproved List (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter).

Stockholder recommendations for director nominees are welcome and should be sent to our Chief Financial Officer, who will forward such recommendations to the Nominating Committee, and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to each nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of each nominee, all of which must be submitted in the time frame described under the appropriate caption in our proxy statement. The Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other sources, using additional criteria, if any, approved by the Board from time to time. Our stockholder communication policy may be amended at any time with the Nominating Committee’s consent.

Pursuant to the Director Resignation Policy adopted by the Board following our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, if a nominee for director in an uncontested election receives less than a majority of the votes cast, the director must submit his resignation to the Board. The Nominating Committee then considers such resignation and makes a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of such resignation. This procedure was implemented following our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Special Committees. In addition to the above described standing committees, the Board establishes special committees as it deems warranted.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Board Member Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meeting

From January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each met or acted without a meeting pursuant to unanimous written consent nine times, four times, three times and three times, respectively. All directors attended at least 75% of all board meetings and committee meetings of which they are members.

We do not have a formal written policy with respect to board members’ attendance at annual stockholder meetings, although we do encourage each of them to attend. With the exception of Mr. Zhao, all of the directors then serving and nominated for re-election virtually attended our last Annual Stockholder Meeting which was held virtually on June 12, 2020.

Stockholder Communications

Stockholders interested in communicating with the Board may do so by writing to any or all directors, care of our Chief Financial Officer, at our principal executive offices. Our Chief Financial Officer will log in all stockholder correspondence and forward to the director addressee(s) all communications that, in his judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Any director may review the correspondence log and request copies of any correspondence. Examples of communications that would be considered inappropriate for consideration by the directors include, but are not limited to, commercial solicitations, trivial, obscene, or profane items, administrative matters, ordinary business matters, or personal grievances. Correspondence that is not appropriate for Board review will be handled by our Chief Financial Officer. All appropriate matters pertaining to accounting or internal controls will be brought promptly to the attention of our Audit Committee Chair.

Stockholder recommendations for director nominees are welcome and should be sent to our Chief Financial Officer, who will forward such recommendations to the Nominating Committee, and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to each nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of each nominee, and must be submitted in the time frame described under the caption, “Stockholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting,” in our last Proxy Statement. The Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other sources, using additional criteria, if any, approved by the Board from time to time. Our stockholder communication policy may be amended at any time with the consent of the Nominating Committee.

Code of Ethics

We have a Code of Ethics (which we call a Code of Conduct) that applies to all our employees, officers and directors. This Code was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. We have posted on our website, www.jakks.com, the full text of such Code. We will disclose when there have been waivers of, or amendments to, such Code, as required by the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and/or Nasdaq.

Pursuant to our Code of Conduct, all of our employees are required to disclose to our General Counsel, the Board or any committee established by the Board to receive such information, any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to actual or apparent conflicts of interest between any of them, personally, and the Company. Our Code of Conduct also directs all employees to avoid any self-interested transactions without full disclosure. This policy, which applies to all of our employees, is reiterated in our Employee Handbook which states that a violation of this policy could be grounds for termination. In approving or rejecting a proposed transaction, our General Counsel, the Board or a designated committee of the Board will consider the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on director independence. Upon concluding their review, they will only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as they determine in good faith. 

Executive Officers

Our executive officers are elected by our Board of Directors and serve pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. One of our executive officers, Stephen G. Berman, is also a Director of the Company. See above for biographical information about this officer. The other current executive officers are John L. Kimble, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and John (Jack) McGrath, our Chief Operating Officer.

John J. (Jack) McGrath has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2011 and is responsible for the Company’s global operations. He brings more than 24 years of experience, having served as our Executive Vice President of Operations from December 2007 until August 2011 when he became our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. McGrath was our Vice President of Marketing from 1999 to August 2003 and Senior Vice President of Operations until 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McGrath was a Brand Marketer for Hot Wheels® at Mattel Inc. and part of its Asia Pacific marketing team. Mr. McGrath served honorably in the U.S. Army and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing.

John L. Kimble became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on November 20, 2019. Mr. Kimble worked for over 12 years at various positions at The Walt Disney Company, ultimately as VP/Finance, Strategy, Operations and Business Development. More recently, Mr. Kimble spent six years at Mattel, Inc. where he served in various positions and concluded his career there as VP/Head of Corporate Development - Licensing Acquisitions - M&A. In between his service at Disney and Mattel, he spent a couple of years as an entrepreneur at a start-up gaming company. He began his career as a consultant for Mars & Co., a global strategy consulting firm. Mr. Kimble received his Bachelor’s Degree in Management Science, Concentration in Finance, Minor in Economics from the Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) and has a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Joel M. Bennett was our Executive Vice President (from May 2000) and our Chief Financial Officer (from September 1995) until his departure in March 2018. Brent T. Novak was our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1, 2018 until December 6, 2019.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

A former director of the Company, who resigned on August 9, 2019 is a partner in a law firm that acts as counsel to the Company. The Company incurred legal fees and expenses to the law firm in the amount of approximately $1.5 million in 2019 and $1.3 million in 2018. As of December 31, 2019, legal fees and reimbursable expenses of $0.1 million was payable to this law firm.

The owner of NantWorks, the Company’s DreamPlay Toys joint venture partner, beneficially owned more than 5.0% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Pursuant to the joint venture agreements, the Company is obligated to pay NantWorks a preferred return on joint venture sales. This agreement expired on September 30, 2018. The owner of NantWorks sold all of its holdings of the Company's shares on December 30, 2019.

In November 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture with Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd., for the purpose of providing certain JAKKS licensed and non-licensed toys and consumer products to agreed-upon territories of the People’s Republic of China. The joint venture includes a subsidiary in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that sells, distributes and markets these products, which include dolls, plush, role play products, action figures, costumes, seasonal items, technology and app-enhanced toys, based on top entertainment licenses and JAKKS’ own proprietary brands. The Company owns fifty-one percent of the joint venture and consolidates the joint venture since control rests with the Company. The non-controlling interest’s share of the income (loss) from the joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $130,000, $169,000 and ($57,000), respectively.

In October 2016, the Company entered into a joint venture with Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited (“Meisheng”), a Hong Kong-based subsidiary of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp, for the purpose of creating and developing original, multiplatform content for children including new short-form series and original shows. JAKKS and Meisheng each own fifty percent of the joint venture and will jointly own the content. JAKKS will retain merchandising rights for kids’ consumer products in all markets except China, which Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp. will oversee through the Company’s existing distribution joint venture. The results of operations of the joint venture are consolidated with the Company’s results. The non-controlling interest’s share of the loss from the joint venture for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was nil. As of December 31, 2020, Meisheng beneficially owned 9.2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock and approximately 5.5% as of September 30, 2021.

In March 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to issue 366,089 shares of its common stock at an aggregate price of $19.3 million to a Hong Kong affiliate of its China joint venture partner. After their shareholder and China regulatory approval, the transaction closed on April 27, 2017. Upon the closing, the Company added a representative of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp as a non-employee director and issued 1,332 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million, which vested in January 2018. In 2018, the Company issued 4,158 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million to the non-employee director, which vested in January 2019. In 2019, the Company issued 5,471 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million to the non-employee director, which vested in January 2020.

Meisheng also serves as a significant manufacturer of the Company. In the first quarter of 2019, Meisheng acquired New Time Group, which was a third-party manufacturer of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company made inventory-related payments to Meisheng of approximately $64.8 million, $94.3 million, and $36.2 million respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, amounts due to Meisheng for inventory received by the Company, but not paid totaled $10.1 million and $18.1 million, respectively.

A director of the Company is a portfolio manager at Oasis Management. In August 2017, the Company agreed with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., the holder of approximately $21.6 million face amount of its 4.25% convertible senior notes due in 2018, to exchange and extend the maturity date of these notes to November 1, 2020. The transaction closed on November 7, 2017. In July 2018, the Company closed a transaction with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., to exchange $8.0 million face amount of the 4.25% convertible senior notes due in August 2018 with convertible senior notes similar to those issued in November 2017. In August 2019, the Company entered into the Recapitalization Transaction. In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company issued (i) amended and restated notes with respect to the $21.6 million Oasis Note issued on November 7, 2017, and the $8.0 million Oasis Note issued on July 26, 2018, and (ii) a new $8.0 million convertible senior note having the same terms as such amended and restated notes. Interest on these new Oasis Notes was payable on each May 1 and November 1 until maturity and accrued at an annual rate of (i) 3.25% if paid in cash or 5.00% if paid in stock plus (ii) 2.75% payable in kind. The new Oasis Notes matured no later than July 3, 2023. As described below, the maturity date of the new Oasis Notes was accelerated to September 1, 2021. The entire balance of the new Oasis Notes was converted into shares of our common stock as of September 1, 2021.

A director of the Company is a director at Benefit Street Partners. As of December 31, 2020, Benefit Street Partners held $61.1 million in principal amount (including $2.3 million in payment-in-kind interest) of the Company’s term loan. On February 5, 2021, Benefit Street Partners and Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd, both related parties, entered into a purchase and sale agreement wherein Benefit Street Partners purchased $11.0 million of principal amount, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, of the new Oasis Notes from Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd. The transaction closed on February 8, 2021. Such Notes were transferred by Benefit Street Partners to unrelated third parties and the entire balance of such Notes was converted into shares of our common stock as of September 1, 2021. 

In June 2021 the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a First Lien Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement with Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., as Sole Lead Arranger, and BSP Agency, LLC, as agent, for a $99,000,000 first-lien secured term loan (the “Initial Term Loan”) and $19,000,000 delayed draw term loan (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”), collectively, the “New Term Loan”). Proceeds from the Initial Term Loan, together with available cash from the Company, were used to repay the Company’s existing term loan, under the loan agreement dated as of August 9, 2019 entered into as part of the Recapitalization Transaction. As a result of this New Term Loan, the maturity date of the Oasis Notes accelerated to no later than September 1, 2021. On July 29, 2021 the Company terminated its Delayed Draw Term Loan option.

A former director of the Company, who was removed by the holders of a majority of the Series A Senior Preferred Stock in September 2021, was the managing Partner and portfolio manager at Axar Capital Management. As of December 31, 2020, Axar Capital Management held $24.3 million in principal amount (including $0.9 million in payment-in-kind interest) of the New Term Loan. 

Pursuant to our Ethical Code of Conduct (a copy of which may be found on our website, www.jakks.com), all of our employees are required to disclose to our General Counsel, the Board of Directors or any committee established by the Board of Directors to receive such information, any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to actual or apparent conflicts of interest between any of them, personally, and us. In addition, our Ethical Code of Conduct also directs all employees to avoid any self-interested transactions without full disclosure. This policy, which applies to all of our employees, is reiterated in our Employee Handbook which states that a violation of this policy could be grounds for termination. In approving or rejecting a proposed transaction, our General Counsel, Board of Directors or designated committee will consider the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on director independence. Upon concluding their review, they will only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as they determine in good faith.   

Limitation of Directors Liability and Indemnification

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that the personal liability of our directors shall be limited to the fullest extent permitted by the provisions of Section 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”). Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL generally provides that no director shall be liable personally to a company or its security holders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that the certificate of incorporation does not eliminate the liability of a director for (1) any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to it or its security holders; (2) acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (3) acts or omissions in respect of certain unlawful dividend payments or stock redemptions or repurchases; or (4) any transaction from which such director derives an improper personal benefit. The effect of this provision is to eliminate the rights of a company and its security holders to recover monetary damages against a director for breach of her or his fiduciary duty of care as a director (including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior) except in the situations described in clauses (1) through (4) above. The limitations summarized above, however, do not affect the ability of a company or its security holders to seek nonmonetary remedies, such as an injunction or rescission, against a director for breach of her or his fiduciary duty. 

In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that we shall, to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, indemnify all persons whom it may indemnify pursuant to Section 145 of the DGCL. In general, Section 145 of the DGCL permits us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees or agents or, when so serving at our request, as directors, officers, agents or employees of another company, who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding because of his or her position, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. 

We maintain a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy covering certain liabilities that may be incurred by any director or officer in connection with the performance of his or her duties and certain liabilities that we may incur, including the indemnification payable to any director or officer. This policy provides for $60.0 million in maximum aggregate coverage, including defense costs. We pay the entire premium for such insurance.

Legal Proceedings

Other than as described in the next paragraph there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents in which indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a claim for such indemnification.

A purported class action lawsuit was filed on November 10, 2020 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Brown v. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. et al) alleging that the Proxy Statement issued in connection with the shareholder meeting held in June 2020 contained misstatements regarding the manner in which broker votes would be counted and that such votes were improperly included in approving the Company’s reverse stock split at the meeting. The purported class action seeks damages in an unspecified amount, alleging breach of fiduciary duties by the Company’s directors. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. Since the action was recently commenced, however, we cannot assure you of its outcome and cannot estimate the range of any potential damage award. The Company held a Special Meeting of the Shareholders on April 30, 2021 at which the shareholders ratified the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation effecting the reverse split, in accordance with ratification procedures under Delaware law.

We are a party to, and certain of our property is the subject of, various pending claims and legal proceedings that routinely arise in the ordinary course of our business, but we do not believe that any of these claims or proceedings will have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us during and for 2020, all Forms 3, 4 and 5 required to be filed during 2020 by our Directors and executive officers were timely filed.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

We believe that a strong management team comprised of highly talented individuals in key positions is critical to our ability to deliver sustained growth and profitability, and our executive compensation program is an important tool for attracting and retaining such individuals. We also believe that our people are our most important resource. While some companies may enjoy an exclusive or limited franchise or are able to exploit unique assets or proprietary technology, we depend fundamentally on the skills, energy and dedication of our employees to drive our business. It is only through their constant efforts that we are able to innovate through the creation of new products and the continual rejuvenation of our product lines, to maintain operating efficiencies, and to develop and exploit marketing channels. With this in mind, we have consistently sought to employ the most talented, accomplished and energetic people available in the industry. Therefore, we believe it is vital that our named executive officers receive an aggregate compensation package that is both highly competitive with the compensation received by similarly-situated executive officers at peer group companies, and also reflective of each individual named executive officer’s contributions to our success on both a long-term and short-term basis. As discussed in greater depth below, the objectives of our compensation program are designed to execute this philosophy by compensating our executives at the top quartile of their peers.

Our executive compensation program is designed with three main objectives:

Administration and Process

Our executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee receives legal advice from our outside general counsel and in previous years has retained a compensation consulting firm, such as Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) and Lipis Consulting, Inc. (“LCI”), which provides advice directly to the Compensation Committee. Historically, the base salary, bonus structure and long-term equity compensation of our executive officers are governed by the terms of their individual employment agreements (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”) and we expect that to continue in the future. With respect to our chief executive officer and president and our chief operating officer, the Compensation Committee, with input from WTW, establishes target performance levels for incentive bonuses based on a number of factors that are designed to further our executive compensation objectives, including our performance, the compensation received by similarly-situated executive officers at peer group companies, the conditions of the markets in which we operate and the relative earnings performance of peer group companies. The chief financial officer also received a bonus based upon performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee.

Historically, factors given considerable weight in establishing bonus performance criteria are Net Sales, Adjusted EPS, which is the net income per share of our common stock calculated on a fully-diluted basis in accordance with GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA applied on a basis consistent with past periods, as adjusted in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee to take account of extraordinary or special items.

As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”), on June 7, 2016 we further amended Mr. Berman’s employment agreement to provide, among other things, for (i) extension of the term to December 31, 2020; (ii) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each $3.5 million Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“Berman Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(b) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that 40% ($1.4 million) of each Berman Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years and 60% ($2.1 million) of each Berman Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. payment is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each Berman Annual Stock Grant determined by the following performance measures: (a) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (b) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (c) EBITDA growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); and (iii) modification of the performance measures for award of his Annual Performance Bonus equal to up to 300% of Base Salary (“Berman Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that the performance measures will be based only upon net revenues and EBITDA, with each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each Berman Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year; and (iv) increase Mr. Berman’s base salary to $1,450,000 effective June 1, 2016 subject to annual increases of at least $25,000 per year thereafter.

On August 9, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) increase of Mr. Berman’s Base Salary to $1,700,000, effective immediately; (ii) addition of a 2020 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, and subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) addition of a special sale transaction bonus equal to $1,000,000 if the Company enters into and consummates a Sale Transaction on or before February 15, 2020, subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 31, 2019), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant; (v) waiver of certain “Change of Control”, Liquidity Event, and other provisions under the Employment Agreement with respect to certain Specified Transactions; and (vi) modification of the definition of “Good Reason Event” to include a change in membership of the Board such that following such change, a majority of the directors are not Continuing Directors. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the third amendment.

On November 18, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) addition of a 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Company’s 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fourth amendment.

On February 18, 2021, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) extension of the Term of the Employment Agreement for an additional three years through December 31, 2024; (ii) addition of a performance bonus opportunity for 2022 – 2024 in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; and (iii) modification of the Annual Restricted Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2022, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to such Annual Restricted Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 2.25% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Berman (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Berman) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fifth amendment.

On August 23, 2011 we entered into an amended employment agreement with John J. (Jack) McGrath whereby he became Chief Operating Officer. As disclosed in greater detail below, Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement also provides for fixed and adjustable bonuses payable based upon adjusted EPS targets set in the agreement, based upon input from our outside consulting firm, with the adjustable bonus capped at a maximum of 125% of base salary. On September 29, 2016 we entered into a Fourth Amendment to the employment agreement with Mr. McGrath which provides, among other things, for (i) extension of the term to December 31, 2020; (i) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“McGrath Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be equal to $1 million, and 40% ($0.4 million) of each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years, and 60% ($0.6 million) of each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon satisfaction of the performance measures at the close of the three year performance period), determined by the following performance measures: (A) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (B) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (C) growth in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); and (iii) modification of the Annual Performance Bonus (“McGrath Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(e) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: the McGrath Annual Bonus will be equal to up to 125% of base salary, and the actual amount will be determined by performance measures based upon net revenues and EBITDA, each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each McGrath Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year, and payable in cash (up to 100% of base salary) and shares of our common stock (any excess over 100% of base salary) with the shares of stock vesting over three years in equal quarterly installments.

Effective December 31, 2019 we amended Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the employment agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) a 2020 and 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the McGrath Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the McGrath Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $1,000,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 0.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by such amendment.

Effective April 1, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Brent T. Novak whereby he became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As disclosed in greater detail below, Mr. Novak’s employment agreement provides for a performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of his base salary for the 2018-2020 fiscal years, which annual bonus shall be determined by the same performance criteria as established by the Compensation Committee of the Board for the applicable fiscal year for the Company’s Chairman/CEO and its Chief Operating Officer each year pursuant to their respective employment agreements, and shall be payable in cash and Restricted Stock Units in the same proportions and calculated in the same manner as provided for the Company’s Chief Operating Officer under such officer’s employment agreement, or if no such employment agreement is in effect, then as provided for in the employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman/CEO, except that the portion payable in Restricted Stock would be payable in Restricted Stock Units.

On October 17, 2019, we further amended Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement to provide for, among other things, the following: (i) payment of a special additional bonus pursuant to Section 2(d) of his Amended Employment Agreement; (ii) if a Sale Transaction is consummated, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 4 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; (iii) if an agreement for a Sale Transaction is entered into and publicly announced but is not closed by January 31, 2020, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; and (iv) upon a termination of Mr. Novak’s employment that is not described in Sections 4 or 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement, he will be entitled to receive twelve (12) months of health care coverage paid by the Company. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement, as amended by Amendment Number Two.

Effective November 20, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with John L. Kimble (the “Kimble Employment Agreement”). The Kimble Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Kimble will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as an at-will employee at an annual salary of $500,000. Mr. Kimble will also receive a grant of $250,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on the date hereof and annual grants of $250,000 of RSUs for the initial year and $500,000 annual grants of RSUs for every year thereafter. The number of shares in each annual grant of RSUs will be determined by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day prior to the day of each annual grant. 60% ($150,000 for the first year and $300,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each annual grant of RSUs determined by the following performance measures: (i) Total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%); (ii) Net revenue growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%), and (iii) EBITDA growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%). 40% ($100,000 for the first year and $200,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will vest in 3 equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and on the second and third anniversaries thereafter. The Kimble Employment Agreement also contains provisions relating to benefits, change of control, and an annual performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of base salary.

On February 18, 2021, we amended the Kimble Employment Agreement as follows: (i) changing Mr. Kimble’s status from an “employee at will” by providing for a term extending through December 31, 2024; (ii) increase in annual salary to $520,000 effective immediately and annual increases of at least 4% commencing January 1, 2022; (iii) modification of the cash performance bonus opportunity for 2021 – 2024 to provide for a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iv) modification of the provision of the Kimble Employment Agreement captioned “Restricted Stock Awards”, effective as of January 2022, to provide for the annual grant of a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to the lesser of (a) his Base Salary in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.05% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Kimble (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Kimble) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan; and (v) as described above, inasmuch as this first amendment changes Mr. Kimble’s status as an employee at will, the Kimble Employment Agreement has also been revised to include provisions regarding minimum stock ownership requirements, “clawback” provisions and termination provisions for “Cause” and “Good Reason”, all of which new provisions, are similar to the provisions in the employment agreements of the Company’s other executive officers . All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Kimble Employment Agreement, as amended by the first amendment.

On September 27, 2021, the Company amended the employment agreements between the Company and each of Mr. Stephen G. Berman, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. John (a/k/a Jack) McGrath, our Chief Operating Officer, and Mr. John Kimble, our Chief Financial Officer. The purpose of the amendments was to change the issuance, past and future, of all restricted stock awards to restricted stock units. All other material terms of the respective employment agreements remain the same, including without limitation, the terms of all such grants including the timing of all vesting periods and the vesting benchmarks.

While the Compensation Committee did not establish target performance levels for our former Chief Financial Officer, Joel Bennett, it did consider similar factors when determining such officer’s bonus. On December 27, 2017, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Bennett (the “Letter Agreement”), which provided for his stepping down from his position following completion of our annual report for the 2017 fiscal year or such earlier date that a successor has been named and transitioned to the office of Chief Financial Officer. The Letter Agreement provides, among other things, that Mr. Bennett will receive a severance payment in a maximum amount of up to 15 month’s salary, accelerated vesting of a portion of his restricted stock units and continued health care coverage for up to 12 months, and it requires Mr. Bennett to comply with confidentiality, non-disparagement and cooperation obligations.

The current employment agreements with our named executive officers also give the Compensation Committee the authority to award additional compensation to each of them as it determines in the Committee’s sole discretion based upon criteria it establishes.

The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the overall compensation of our named executive officers for the purpose of determining whether discretionary bonuses should be granted. The Compensation Committee did not consult with, or retain, a compensation consultant in 2020.

Peer Group

One of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee is the relative performance and the compensation of executives of peer group companies, which are comprised of a group of companies selected in conjunction with WTW that we believe provides relevant comparative information and represent a cross-section of publicly-traded companies with product lines and businesses similar to our own throughout the comparison period. The composition of the peer group is reviewed annually and adjusted as circumstances warrant. For the last fiscal year, the peer group companies utilized for executive compensation analysis, which remained the same as in the previous year, were:

Elements of Executive Compensation

The compensation packages for the Company’s senior executives have both performance-based and non-performance based elements. Based on its review of each named executive officer’s total compensation opportunities and performance, and the Company’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines each year’s compensation in the manner that it considers to be most likely to achieve the objectives of our executive compensation program. The specific elements, which include base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term equity compensation, are described below.

The Compensation Committee has negative discretion to adjust performance results used to determine annual incentive and the vesting schedule of long-term incentive payouts to the named executive officers and has discretion to grant bonuses even if the performance targets were not met.

Base Salary

Our executive officers receive base salary pursuant to the terms of their employment agreement. Mr. Berman has been an executive officer at least since his entry into his employment agreement in 2010, Mr. McGrath became an executive officer on August 23, 2011 pursuant to the terms of an amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Novak became an executive officer when he entered into an employment agreement on April 1, 2018 through his resignation on December 6, 2019, and Mr. Kimble became an executive officer when he entered into a letter employment agreement on November 20, 2019.

Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements as in effect on December 31, 2013, Messrs. Berman and McGrath each receive a base salary which is increased automatically each year by at least $25,000 for Mr. Berman and $15,000 for Mr. McGrath. Any further increase in base salary, as the case may be above the contractually required minimum increase, is determined by the Compensation Committee based on the Committee’s analysis of a combination of two factors: the salaries paid in peer group companies to executives with similar responsibilities, and evaluation of the executive’s unique role, job performance and other circumstances. Evaluating both of these factors allows us to offer a competitive total compensation value to each individual named executive officer that takes into account the unique attributes of and circumstances relating to each individual and marketplace factors. This approach has allowed us to continue to meet our objective of offering a competitive total compensation value and attracting and retaining key personnel. Based on its review of these factors, the Compensation Committee determined not to increase the base salary of each of Messrs. McGrath and Bennett above the contractually required minimum increase in 2017-2019 as unnecessary to maintain our competitive total compensation position in the marketplace. Pursuant to the 2019 amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Berman’s base salary as of August 9, 2019 was increased to $1,700,000.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

The function of the annual cash bonus is to establish a direct correlation between the annual incentives awarded to the participants and our financial performance. This purpose is in keeping with our compensation program’s objective of aligning a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our annual performance and the interests of our shareholders.

The employment agreements in effect during 2019 for Messrs. Berman, McGrath, Novak and Kimble provided for an incentive bonus award (payable in cash and restricted stock for Messrs. Berman and McGrath, and in cash and restricted stock units for Messrs. Novak and Kimble) based on a percentage of each participant’s base salary if the performance goals set by the Compensation Committee are met for that year. The employment agreements for Messrs. Berman and McGrath mandated that the specific criteria to be used is growth in net sales, EBITDA and total shareholder return, and the Committee sets the various target thresholds to be met to earn increasing amounts of the bonus up to a maximum of 300% of base salary for Mr. Berman and 125% for Messrs. McGrath, Novak and Kimble, although the Compensation Committee has the ability to increase the maximum in its discretion. The employment agreements for Messrs. Novak and Kimble provide for their criteria to be similar to Mr. McGrath’s. Commencing in 2012, the Committee is required to meet to establish criteria for earning the annual performance bonus (and with respect to Mr. Berman, any additional annual performance bonus) during the first quarter of the year. As described elsewhere herein, Mr. Berman’s employment agreement was further amended in 2016, 2019 and 2021, Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement was further amended in 2011, 2019 and 2021 and Mr. Kimble’s employment agreement was amended in 2021.

The employment agreements in effect on January 1, 2017 for Messrs. Berman, McGrath and our chief executive officers contemplated that the Compensation Committee may grant discretionary bonuses in situations where, in its sole judgment, it believes they are warranted. The Committee approaches this aspect of the particular executive’s compensation package by looking at the other components of the executive’s aggregate compensation and then evaluating if any additional compensation is appropriate to meet our compensation goals. The Committee did not approve discretionary bonuses for 2018, approved discretionary bonuses of $750,000 and $138,000 to Messrs. Berman and McGrath, respectively, for 2019. Mr. Kimble received a $100,000 discretionary bonus for 2020.

Long-Term Compensation

Long-term compensation is an area of particular emphasis in our executive compensation program because we believe that these incentives foster the long-term perspective necessary for our continued success. This emphasis is in keeping with our compensation program objective of aligning a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our long-term performance and the interests of our shareholders.

Historically, our long-term compensation program has focused on the granting of stock options that vested over time. However, commencing in 2006 we began shifting the emphasis of this element of compensation, and we currently favor the issuance of restricted stock awards or units. The Compensation Committee believes that the award of full-value shares that vest over time is consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and objectives, as the value of the restricted stock and units vary based upon the performance of our common stock, thereby aligning the interests of our executives with our shareholders. The Committee has also determined that awards of restricted stock awards and units are anti-dilutive as compared to stock options inasmuch as it feels that less restricted awards have to be granted to match the compensation value of stock options.

Mr. Berman’s 2010 amended and restated employment provided for annual grants of $500,000 of restricted stock which vest in equal annual installments through January 1, 2017, which was one year following the life of the agreement, subject to meeting the 3% vesting condition, as defined in the agreement. As described in greater detail below, pursuant to the 2012 amendment, commencing in 2013, this bonus changed to $3,500,000 of restricted stock, part of which vests over four years and part of which are subject to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread out over three years. Mr. McGrath’s amended employment agreement provides for annual grants of $75,000 of restricted stock which vests in equal installments over three years subject to meeting certain EPS milestones. As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangement”), it was changed to $1,000,000 of restricted stock effective January 1, 2017 subject in part to time vesting over four years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. Mr. Novak’s employment agreement provided for annual grants of $750,000 of RSUs subject in part to time vesting over three years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. Mr. Kimble’s employment agreement provided for a grant of $250,000 of RSU for the initial year and annual grants of $500,000 of RSUs thereafter subject in part to time vesting over three years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. The milestone targets for each of these employment agreements are established by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each year. The Company did not meet the vesting requirements contained in any of the employment agreements for 2017, so both Messrs. Berman and McGrath forfeited their stock awards for that year. As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”), the employment agreements for Messrs. Berman and McGrath also provide for an annual performance bonus based upon net revenue and EBITDA criteria. Commencing in 2012 for Mr. Berman and 2017 for Mr. McGrath, the criteria for earning such bonus are to be established by the Compensation Committee. This bonus, if earned, is payable partially in cash and partially in shares of restricted common stock. Messrs. Berman and McGrath earned 75% of the bonus based upon EBITDA criteria in 2020. Messrs. Berman and McGrath did not earn this bonus for 2019 or 2018.

Mr. Berman’s and McGrath's employment agreement also provide for an additional bonus solely in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. After a review of all of the factors discussed above, the Compensation Committee determined that, in keeping with our compensation objectives, Mr. Berman and McGrath were awarded $762,500 and $200,000 of discretionary bonus, respectively, for 2019. Mr. Kimble received a $100,000 discretionary bonus for 2020.

Other Benefits and Perquisites

Our executive officers participate in the health and dental coverage, life insurance, paid vacation and holidays, 401(k) retirement savings plans and other programs that are generally available to all of the Company’s employees.

The provision of any additional perquisites to each of the named executive officers is subject to review by the Compensation Committee. Historically, these perquisites include payment of an automobile allowance and matching contributions to a 401(k) defined contribution plan. In 2018 - 2020, the named executive officers were granted the following perquisites: automobile allowance and 401(k) plan matching contribution for Messrs. Berman, McGrath, Kimble, Novak and Bennett; and a life insurance benefit for Mr. Berman. We value perquisites at their incremental cost in accordance with SEC regulations.

We believe that the benefits and perquisites we provide to our named executive officers are within competitive practice and customary for executives in key positions at comparable companies. Such benefits and perquisites serve our objective of offering competitive compensation that allows us to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly talented people to these critical positions, ultimately providing a substantial benefit to our shareholders.

Change of Control/Termination Agreements

We recognize that, as with any public company, it is possible that a change of control may take place in the future and that the threat or occurrence of a change of control can result in significant distractions of key management personnel because of the uncertainties inherent in such a situation. We further believe that it is essential and in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders to retain the services of our key management personnel in the event of the threat or occurrence of a change of control and to ensure their continued dedication and efforts in such event without undue concern for their personal financial and employment security. In keeping with this belief and its objective of retaining and motivating highly talented individuals to fill key positions, which is consistent with our general compensation philosophy, the employment agreement for named chief executive officers contain provisions which guarantee specific payments and benefits upon a termination of employment without good reason following a change of control of the Company. In addition, the employment agreements also contain provisions providing for certain lump-sum payments if the executive is terminated without “cause” or if we materially breach the agreement leading the affected executive to terminate the agreement for good reason, as applicable.

Additional details of the terms of the change of control agreements and termination provisions outlined above are provided below.

Compensation Risk Management

As part of its annual review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee reviews with management the design and operation of our incentive compensation arrangements for senior management, including executive officers, to determine if such programs might encourage inappropriate risk-taking that could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committee considers, among other things, the features of the Company’s compensation program that are designed to mitigate compensation-related risk, such as the performance objectives and target levels for incentive awards (which are based on overall Company performance), and its compensation recoupment policy. The Compensation Committee also considers our internal control structure which, among other things, limits the number of persons authorized to execute material agreements, requires approval of our Board of Directors for matters outside of the ordinary course and its whistle blower program. Based upon the above, the Committee concluded that any risks arising from the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Impact of Shareholder Advisory Vote

At our 2020 annual meeting, our shareholders approved our current executive compensation with over 86% of all shares actually voting on the issue affirmatively giving their approval. Accordingly, we believe that this vote ratifies our executive compensation philosophy and policies, as currently adopted and implemented, and we intend to continue such philosophy and policies.

Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd – Frank Act”), the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the total annual compensation of the principal executive officer ("PEO"). Our PEO is Mr. Berman. Our calculation of the ratio of the median employee compensation to our PEO’s compensation for the year ended December 31, 2020 is set forth below.